Skip to content Skip to left sidebar Skip to right sidebar Skip to footer

Contract Awards

Stop! Don’t Upload Your MAS Catalog Until You Get FCP Access

Effective immediately, newly awarded contractors must not use SIP or EDI-832 to upload catalogs to GSA Advantage!.

What to Do

  1. Use the required templates.
    Since MAS Refresh 29 (Aug 28, 2025), vendors must submit offers using:
  • FCP Product File
  • FCP Services Plus File
  • SIN-Specific Price Proposal Templates (limited SINs) (buy.gsa.gov 9.29.25)

If you used Products PPT or Services & Training PPT, convert your data to the FCP template. Templates live on the MAS Required Templates page. (ibid)

  1. Wait for your “Welcome to FCP” email before uploading data.
  • Awards Aug 28–Oct 7 → FCP access Oct 14, 2025
  • Awards Oct 7–Nov 5 → FCP access Nov 11, 2025
  • Awards after Nov 5 → Timeline coming soon
  • Awards before Aug 28 → Continue SIP/EDI-832 until bulk onboarding moves you to FCP (28-day notice). (ibid)
  1. Register your contract with the Vendor Support Center (VSC).
    Do this as soon as you win. Registration is required to use FCP and show your contract on eBuy. (ibid)

In the meantime, validate your Product and Services Plus Files. Clean data = fewer FCP errors later. (ibid)

If you’re a newly awarded MAS contractor and unsure how to handle catalog uploads or registration, give us a call.

What’s Next for Federal Acquisition? David Berteau’s Parting Insights for Government Contractors

As David Berteau steps down from his role as CEO of the Professional Services Council (PSC), federal contractors would be wise to pay close attention to the lessons he leaves behind. With over four decades in federal acquisition, from the Pentagon to PSC, Berteau has seen the full arc of government contracting’s evolution and knows exactly where the industry needs to go next. (Federal News Network April 29, 2025)

From Inputs to Outcomes: A Call for Smarter Procurement

“The government used to buy results. Now it buys labor hours and storage capacity,” Berteau said in a farewell conversation with Federal News Network’s Tom Temin. His message to contractors is clear: success in the coming era will depend on shifting the conversation with agencies back to mission outcomes—not just technical specs or cost ceilings. (ibid)

For firms competing in a crowded, compliance-heavy space, being outcome-focused is more than a strategy—it’s a differentiator. “We need to help the government define what success looks like, and tailor solutions to achieve that,” he emphasized. (ibid)

Tech Innovation Has Left the Building—and That’s an Opportunity

Gone are the days when the Pentagon seeded cutting-edge technology. Today, Berteau said, commercial markets drive innovation, and contractors must be fluent in adapting those tools for government use, securely, affordably, and at scale. (ibid)

“Most new technology now comes from the global commercial space. The government’s role is still critical, especially for defense but the dynamic has flipped,” he noted. (ibid)

Contractors that understand how to integrate commercial tech into mission-specific architectures, from cloud platforms to edge computing, are already outpacing those still anchored in legacy systems. (ibid)

The Competitive Edge: Culture and Mission Alignment

For government service providers, Berteau stressed that culture is the real competitive advantage. “You can’t sustain success in this market without a commitment to the mission,” he said. “The red tape is real. If your people aren’t motivated by public service, they won’t last.” (ibid)

This alignment is especially critical in today’s talent market, where attracting and retaining cleared, capable professionals remains a top challenge. Contractors who invest in a strong mission-driven culture, Berteau argued, will win, not just the next bid, but long-term relevance. (ibid)

Politics Matter, But Execution Wins

While policy shifts and partisan changes affect contracting conditions, Berteau reminded industry leaders to stay focused on execution. “The best companies in this space don’t get distracted by politics. They stay grounded in what matters: delivering value, staying compliant, and helping agencies succeed.” (ibid)

With a new wave of acquisition reform always around the corner, staying agile and compliant remains essential. “You can’t perform if you’re not compliant. And if you don’t perform, you won’t be around for long,” he said bluntly. (ibid)

Still in the Fight—Just Not Full Time

Though Berteau is stepping back from day-to-day operations, he made it clear he’s not exiting the federal contracting world entirely. “I’ve got a lot left to say and do. I’ll keep writing, advising, and staying connected.” (ibid)

For government contractors navigating increasing complexity, Berteau’s departure marks the end of an era, but not the loss of insight. His advice to the industry: stay competitive, stay compliant, and above all, stay aligned with the mission. (ibid)

Questions concerning the changing federal acquisition landscape? Give us a call.

OMB Issues First Governmentwide AI Acquisition Policy

The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) released new guidance today to improve how Federal agencies acquire artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. The guidance, outlined in the memo Advancing the Responsible Acquisition of AI in Government, directs agencies to boost cross-functional collaboration, manage AI risks and performance, and foster a competitive AI market. (MeriTalk October 3, 2024)

OMB’s Deputy Director for Management, Jason Miller, emphasized the need for responsible AI procurement, stating that Federal agencies will either have AI systems built by contractors or purchase them directly. “This new memo equips agencies with the tools to capture AI’s potential while managing its risks,” Miller said. (ibid)

A large portion of the memo focuses on managing AI risks, with OMB mandating early involvement from agency privacy officials in AI acquisition processes to identify privacy risks and ensure legal compliance. Agencies are also instructed to negotiate contracts that require vendors to provide detailed information for evaluating AI systems, assessing risks, and protecting government data. (ibid)

The guidance addresses generative AI specifically, calling for testing, red-teaming, and evaluation to ensure the safety and appropriateness of AI tools. It also promotes practices to avoid vendor lock-in, prioritize transparency, and ensure interoperability in AI systems. (ibid)

This guidance fulfills a key part of the Biden-Harris administration’s October 2023 AI executive order and reflects input gathered from public comments and industry roundtables. OMB’s Miller highlighted the Federal government’s significant purchasing power, noting that in 2023, it spent over $100 billion on IT products and services. He stressed that responsible procurement decisions can accelerate AI advancements while mitigating risks for government use. (ibid)

Questions concerning the new OMB issued AI guidance? Give us a call.

The Bad, the Ugly and some Good

Small businesses experienced a mixed bag in their pursuit of federal contracts during fiscal year 2023. On one hand, the government allocated a record-breaking $178.6 billion to small businesses, marking a significant increase from previous years. However, this surge in funding was accompanied by a concerning trend: a decline in the number of small businesses securing prime government contracts, dropping by 2.2 percent compared to the previous fiscal year. (INC. May 1, 2024)

Despite receiving a larger share of federal contracting dollars, small businesses faced formidable challenges in competing for contracts. The competitive landscape remains dominated by larger, more established players, placing smaller enterprises at a disadvantage due to their limited resources. Contract bundling further exacerbates the issue by consolidating contracts into larger, more complex opportunities that are often inaccessible to smaller firms. (ibid)

Another hurdle for small businesses is the complexity of federal contracts, which can be daunting to navigate. The House of Representatives recently passed a bill aimed at simplifying the language within federal contracts to make them more accessible and comprehensible to small businesses. This initiative seeks to level the playing field and enhance the competitiveness of smaller players in the federal contracting arena. (ibid)

Despite these challenges, the Small Business Administration (SBA) under Administrator Isabel Guzman has implemented initiatives to expand contracting opportunities for small businesses. This includes revising size standards to broaden access to agency programs, benefitting thousands of entrepreneurs across various industries. While progress has been made in meeting procurement spending targets for certain small-business categories, there is still work to be done to ensure that all small businesses have equitable access to federal contracting opportunities. (ibid)

Do you have questions about size standards or a particular upcoming opportunity? Please give us a call.

Too Small, Too Big, or Just Right

Midsized government contractors find themselves in a challenging position, squeezed between the advantages afforded to small businesses and the resources available to large corporations. While small firms benefit from set-aside contracts and large enterprises have the capacity for significant growth, midsized companies often struggle to compete for both small and large contracts due to restrictive requirements and certifications. (Washington Technology May 2, 2024)

The government contracting landscape favors small businesses, with an increasing number of contracts set aside for socio-economically disadvantaged enterprises. Conversely, large corporations have the financial backing and resources to pursue growth through acquisitions. This leaves midsized firms in a precarious position, with limited opportunities for growth and survival. (ibid)

Structural impediments further compound the challenges for midsized contractors. Stringent compliance requirements and certifications are necessary to win larger contracts, but acquiring these credentials can be a catch-22. For instance, firms may need certifications like the Contractor Purchasing System Review (CPSR) to qualify for certain contracts, but they can only undergo these reviews if they already have contracts that require them. (ibid)

For instance, the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) may require companies to undergo a Contractor Purchasing System Review (CPSR) to verify their efficiency and effectiveness in managing government funds once their anticipated annual sales surpass $50 million. This requirement is logical. However, if a firm lacks an ongoing contract mandating the DCMA audit, they cannot undergo the review, making it nearly impossible to pursue new contracts with similar requirements. This lack of flexibility defies logic. (ibid)

Despite these challenges, midsized firms can leverage the Goldilocks Effect to their advantage. By combining the agility of small businesses with the resources and experience of larger corporations, they can offer tailored solutions and personalized attention to agency customers. Strategies such as tailoring solutions, demonstrating delivery success, and cultivating long-term relationships can help midsized contractors establish themselves as reliable and innovative partners for government agencies. Through patience and differentiation, midsized firms can transform obstacles into opportunities and position themselves as valuable partners in the government contracting ecosystem. (ibid)

Midsized firm looking to capitalize on your experience through innovative partnerships with government agencies? Give us a call.